I just came across another article that holds up Catholic priests as central figures in the sexual abuse of children. Do you think they are?
For a dozen years the Catholic Church has been the target of unrelenting criticism not only because of the sexual abuse exposed by the 2002 Boston Globe’s investigative series, but also because of the revelations that the hierarchy covered up the abuses. Most of the criticism is deserved. But not all.
It’s true that thousands of priests in U.S. Catholic parishes were, and are, pedophiles. It’s also true that many Bishops covered up the abuse, moved priests to other parishes—sometimes to other states and countries, bribed or threatened victims into silence, failed to report the crimes to the police, covered up and destroyed evidence. Some Bishops were, themselves, predators.
Undoubtedly, there is much more we don’t know.
But this is something I do know: The Catholic Church is not the problem.
No matter how loudly the media trumpets the ills of the church, those ills don’t absolve the real villains—the pedophiles, the predators. And the church isn’t the only place that harbors them.
Our whole society harbors them. They live among us. To focus on a single organization as being a safe haven for predators mischaracterizes the entire problem. Predators follow the prey, wherever they are. It’s not like pedophiles hang out in remote areas waiting for some unsuspecting child to wander by. Predators seek jobs and volunteer activities that put them in regular contact with children. They look for opportunities that give them positions of respect, authority over children—sometimes authority over parents, and at least some discretion and autonomy. Pedophiles can be clergy, teachers, doctors, lawyers, police, legislators, coaches, scout leaders, or any vocation or volunteer activity.
Predators also seek relationships with other predators. They form networks in order to exchange tips, access to children, photographs. Some of the online networks of these predators are huge. But they also form relationships with others in close proximity to themselves. Some of those relationships may be with people in the same organization, but for the most part the relationships are with people who share the same deviant interests. Such interests span organizational boundaries. Some networks have specialized interests in children under a certain age, or in teen boys or girls, or in children with special needs.
Predators seek relationships with us, too. Ultimately, we are the ones who grant the predators’ access to children. We grant them our trust, usually by default.
Wherever there are children, that’s where the predators gather. And where do you find the most children? In our schools. Charol Shakeshaft, a professor at Virginia Commonwealth University, has studied this issue for decades. A study she conducted in 2004 showed that 9.6 percent of students, grades 8 to 12, experienced educator sexual misconduct. Some of this would be considered grooming behavior rather than outright abuse, but it is a staggering number. According to other research she has conducted, the rate of sexual abuse by teachers is 100 time greater than the rate of abuse by the clergy.
So, why the demonization of the clergy, more specifically priests, around the issue of child sexual abuse? I think it’s because they are easy targets. We want to blame someone, and who better than a group that is reluctant to fight back?
If we blame the priests we don’t have to confront the truth that most of us encounter child sexual predators, regularly, as we go about our day to day lives and as we ignore the clear signs of their evil intent. If we blame the priests, we don’t have to accept responsibility for allowing predators the opportunity to seduce our children. If we blame the priests, we don’t have to worry as much about our children in the public schools. If we blame the priests we can excuse our willful ignorance about the nature and scope of this very complex problem.
We don’t want to think about these ugly things. They are depressing issues that cannot be sugarcoated.
It’s more comfortable to blame the clergy.
5 thoughts on “Are Priests the Problem?”
You are spot on target here!
There is one thing I do know for sure. A friend’s son is a young priest .He was happy to have made it through the vetting process into the seminary and for this he feels he is where God wants him to be. According to his experiences the Seminary Rectors send every applicant to a psychologist for screening before entrance. They are screened to see if they are “homophobc” NOT to determine if they have,” ….deep rooted homosexual tendencies” as the previous Pope once stated.
When asked why, the priest responded the reason was because the Bishops want to avoid complaints from other straight chaste priests who may occupy the same rectories.
Examples of Catholic priests who complained to their Bishops about fellow rectory priests either bullying them because they did not accept their sodomite lifestyles and or were downloading child pornography abound .
Fr Haley Fr Despard, former Fr Robert Hoatson, just to name a few more recent “complainers”.
Is the Church the problem? No, the Bishops are, those who have long since abandoned the Faith in favor of presiding over a Diocese as Business Accountants and politicians.
Good priests have been dismissed or have left at alarming rates while the “pious” bishops ask the pew people to ,”Pray for vocations.”
One recent example….
The late Fr Malachi Martin told me personally he helped to support no less than forty othodox priests who were persecuted by their Bishops for telling the truth.
Bringing up these concerns to your Bishops is ,”…like farting at skunks.”
The financial money saving business and liability solution, rather than cleaning up the seminaries is this….
From Diocesan employees who like to brag that they are in the know ……….
, “…..priests will become just employees of the Diocese with a paycheck, not live in rectories and eventully have no need of wearing those vestments at Mass. This is what Rome wants.”
So just like the teacher who abuses off school grounds or the scout master who abuses while not on a scouting outing ,organizations such as the Catholic Church will not be held responsible for the molesters they hired as long as they fingerprinted them and alledged to have done background checks.
I have been waiting for over forty years to hear one good homily against the mortal sins of viewing and producing pornography . All I have ever heard in the more “conservative and traditional” parishes is how women should dress more modestly and not wear pants.
It takes REAL men to stand up against sins committed mainly by males. I want real priests to address these sins from the pulpit, if they truly believe God gave them the authority to protect women and children. Real men should express their appreciation of modesty to women and those women who wish to attract decent men ,will dress accordingly. All to common, they comment appreciatively over the lack of clothing they view ,rather than the virtues of purity and modesty.
Without chaste real priests at the pulpit ,men will never hear their sins of impurity condemned.
Rather, many men, and now even some women , continue to believe by outwardly admiring publicly exposed flesh , an excuse of their own sexual identity.
Sad……….because pornography is a powerful mental instigation for societal obsessions becoming actions. It is the root cause of ruining countless marriages , lives and culture
There appears to be a well used pattern when it comes to institutional pedophile coverups, whether amongst the political ,clerical, educational or scouting corporate structures .
Everyone should read the Franklin CoverUp by Senator John DeCamp